| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | chris(at)bitmead(dot)com |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |
| Date: | 2000-02-15 00:54:48 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000214165448.01737ec0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:30 AM 2/15/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>It's a logical fact that the existance of "offset", automatically
>implies
>ordering, no matter how many SQL textbooks you quote.
Chris, that is your opinion and judging from the responses of other
folks on this list, it appears to be very much a minority opinion.
Minority of one, as a matter of fact. There has been a parade
of posts disagreeing with your opinion.
Why not give up and get on with your life before I get tired of
being polite? I'm *much* more stubborn than you are, particularly
when I'm right.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-02-15 01:00:04 | RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-02-15 00:52:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |