Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: bruc(at)acm(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright
Date: 2000-01-29 15:07:34
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000129070734.0103b5b0@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 02:10 AM 1/29/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

>If anyone wants to look into Apache and see how it's set up, I've got no
>problem with taking a look. I think it's real easy to make a mountain
>out of a molehill in this area, however. Look at FSF --- they actually
>require signed paperwork (hard copy, not email) from any potential
>contributor before they will accept code contributions. Do we want to
>get that anal-retentive? I hope not.

Yes, in spirit I'm certainly with you on this one. I presume some
laywer started hacking code in his spare time then started hacking
the FSF as well :)

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-01-29 15:48:36 RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug?
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-01-29 15:00:58 Re: [HACKERS] Copyright