| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write.. |
| Date: | 1999-06-25 13:13:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.19990625061311.0078be90@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:23 AM 6/25/99 +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 wrote:
>> So...does it sound like I'm doing the right thing?
>>
>> I don't see how this could be, since the first FlushBuffer still does
>> the sync.
Oh-uh, you're right of course. The first select doesn't hit
the disk, the next one does during the first flugh. Silly me,
where was my head?
Sigh.
So, Vadim's "right way" is also the "only way", it would appear.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-25 13:21:23 | Re: [HACKERS] solution for psql segmentation fault ?? |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 1999-06-25 13:03:17 | Re: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write.. |