R: R: slow seqscan after vacuum analize

From: "Edoardo Ceccarelli" <eddy(at)axa(dot)it>
To: "'David F(dot) Skoll'" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, "'Edoardo Ceccarelli'" <eddy(at)axa(dot)it>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: R: R: slow seqscan after vacuum analize
Date: 2004-02-05 02:18:31
Message-ID: 2s28b9$kqpmo@mailr-1.tiscali.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Yes, you are right but it wasn't the case this time, I have run the explain plenty of
times with same results. I think that the reason was that I made a simple VACUUM,
after a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE (1h!!) things are ok

Best Regards
Edoardo

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: David F. Skoll [mailto:dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com]
> Inviato: giovedì 5 febbraio 2004 3.17
> A: Edoardo Ceccarelli
> Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Oggetto: Re: R: [ADMIN] slow seqscan after vacuum analize
>
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Edoardo Ceccarelli wrote:
>
> > Things are worst only for seqscan, when it uses indexscan
> timing is good.
>
> It might just be that running VACUUM flushed the operating
> system's buffer cache.
>
> I always try running two or three EXPLAIN ANALYZE's in a row
> for the same query. Usually, the first one takes much longer
> than the rest.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-02-05 04:18:39 Re: R: R: slow seqscan after vacuum analize
Previous Message David F. Skoll 2004-02-05 02:17:02 Re: R: slow seqscan after vacuum analize