Re: funny view/temp table problem with query

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: funny view/temp table problem with query
Date: 2009-02-26 10:02:14
Message-ID: 2f4958ff0902260202q42e076f6l6460f8d47cac795e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

looks like you completely misunderstood my question.
First of all, I wonder why the same query divided up in half - and
using temporary table works as expected, and with everything together
doesn't. And about rand(), it was tested on large enough set of runs,
that I don't think it is to blame.
The queries do everything I wanted it to do, and - no - doing it in
software is just baaad, and doesn't do.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eus 2009-02-26 10:15:49 Re: Can I use a query with UPDATE on its SET?
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2009-02-26 09:50:18 Format string for ISO-8601 date and time