| From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? |
| Date: | 2008-07-09 18:11:32 |
| Message-ID: | 2e78013d0807091111h521b904i2f5f1f6015c718e3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Have received exactly zero feedback on the question of whether I should be
> assigning reviewers to "WIP" patches or not.
>
I think we should. For example, one of the WIP patches is submitted by
me. One reason I marked it WIP because I was not sure what is
considered as WIP and what is not. The patch is ready for review, but
of course have some open items and may need further work once I
receive the feedback. But I can not make progress either before the
current work is reviewed, either at the code level or design level. I
expect that feedback during this commit fest.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2008-07-09 18:24:51 | Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-07-09 17:59:56 | CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? |