Re: CREATE TABLE, load and freezing

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE, load and freezing
Date: 2008-02-29 04:06:27
Message-ID: 2e78013d0802282006w69f8f032y1a1af3b376ec4aec@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>
> We've heard that idea before, and it's just as bad as it was when
> proposed before. "Pre-frozen" tuples eliminate any possibility of
> tracking when a tuple was inserted; which is extremely important to know
> when you are trying to do forensic analysis of a broken table. The
> point of the current design is to not throw away information about tuple
> insertion time until the tuple is old enough that the info is (probably)
> not interesting anymore.
>

Understood. But if we consider a special case of creation and loading
of a table in a single transaction, we can possibly save the information
that the table was loaded with pre-frozen tuples with xmin equals to the
transaction creating the table.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-02-29 04:07:36 Re: Silly Newbie question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-29 04:03:31 Re: OSSP can be used in the windows environment now!