Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuum full crash

From: "Mikko Partio" <mpartio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum full crash
Date: 2008-03-30 18:26:49
Message-ID: 2ca799770803301126p6facf429r108b06ca4e54440a@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> It would be good to fix it I suppose, but what with VACUUM FULL being on
> the edge of deprecation anyway, it's hard to muster enthusiasm for doing
> a (probably) large additional amount of work on it,  I think most
> hackers would prefer to spend time on making it unnecessary than making
> it more bulletproof.
>


Interesting. What is planned substitute for VACUUM FULL? CLUSTER?

Regards

Mikko

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Bernhard D RohrerDate: 2008-03-30 19:24:04
Subject: Re: local authentication with md5 - solved
Previous:From: Bernhard D RohrerDate: 2008-03-30 16:56:22
Subject: local authentication with md5

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group