Re: Vacuum full crash

From: "Mikko Partio" <mpartio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum full crash
Date: 2008-03-30 18:26:49
Message-ID: 2ca799770803301126p6facf429r108b06ca4e54440a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> It would be good to fix it I suppose, but what with VACUUM FULL being on
> the edge of deprecation anyway, it's hard to muster enthusiasm for doing
> a (probably) large additional amount of work on it, I think most
> hackers would prefer to spend time on making it unnecessary than making
> it more bulletproof.
>

Interesting. What is planned substitute for VACUUM FULL? CLUSTER?

Regards

Mikko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernhard D Rohrer 2008-03-30 19:24:04 Re: local authentication with md5 - solved
Previous Message Bernhard D Rohrer 2008-03-30 16:56:22 local authentication with md5