| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: next CommitFest |
| Date: | 2009-11-12 16:37:32 |
| Message-ID: | 2b5e566d0911120837t34a3b477i1568b3e7be6f4786@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Not a new idea, but I think we should require all patch submitters to do
> one review per submission. There needs to be a balance between time
> spent on review and time spent on dev. The only real way this happens in
> any community is by peer review.
I like this idea. Perhaps also if a person is reviewing a patch for
the first time, we could make some effort to get a more experienced
person paired up with them.
Pairing up was really useful for the PDXPUG folks working on review.
--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
http://endpoint.com - work
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-11-12 16:38:25 | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-12 16:36:04 | Re: next CommitFest |