Re: more than 2GB data string save

From: AI Rumman <rummandba(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more than 2GB data string save
Date: 2010-02-10 06:38:03
Message-ID: 2a7905441002092238y3d2c96ecrcec7ac7126251746@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for your quick answes.

But if I use a file and then store the name in the database, is it possible
to use TEXT search tsvector and tsquery indexing on these external files?

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:38 PM, AI Rumman <rummandba(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> How to save 2 GB or more text string in Postgresql?
> >> Which data type should I use?
> >
> > If you have to you can use either the lo interface, or you can use
> > bytea. Large Object (i.e. lo) allows for access much like fopen /
> > fseek etc in C, but the actual data are not stored in a row with
> > other data, but alone in the lo space. Bytea is a legit type that you
> > can have as one of many in a row, but you retrieve the whole thing at
> > once when you get the row.
>
> Bytea definitely won't handle more than 1 GB. I don't think the lo
> interface
> will handle more than 2GB.
>
> >
> > Preferred way to store 2GB data is to put it into a file and put the
> > name of the file into the database.
>
>
> This.
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message karsten vennemann 2010-02-10 06:48:38 dump of 700 GB database
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-02-10 06:36:37 Re: more than 2GB data string save