| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
| Date: | 2008-07-29 18:03:32 |
| Message-ID: | 2ED21153-6552-45B1-A1CD-9F1C8900A07B@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 29, 2008, at 11:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> Damn, I was away from mail yesterday; sorry. I have some revisions,
>> mostly improving casting compatibility with text.
>
> Huh? What's to improve?
>
> I know that you're still fooling with the regexp functions, but I
> figured that could be added later.
>
>> Tom, have you committed anything yet?
>
> No, but I've put a couple of hours into editorialization and don't
> want to throw that away. How about you wait for my commit and then
> send a patch revising whatever you want to?
Sure. It's mostly just additional casts and tests. I'd be happy to
integrate it into your commit.
Thanks,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2008-07-29 18:21:18 | Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-29 18:01:41 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |