Re: postgresql vs mysql

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Brandon Aiken <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
Date: 2007-02-22 23:27:47
Message-ID: 2E232049-B976-4132-8C09-7C2486384655@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Brandon Aiken wrote:
> IMX, the only things going for MySQL are:
> 1. It's fast.

That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2007-02-22 23:32:45 Re: Out of memory on vacuum analyze
Previous Message Mark Walker 2007-02-22 23:20:55 Re: php professional