Re: [HACKERS] OSS database needed for testing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Jeffrey D(dot) Brower" <jeff(at)pointhere(dot)net>, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OSS database needed for testing
Date: 2003-04-04 04:54:06
Message-ID: 2994.1049432046@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> We'd have to use a subset of it. 30G is a little larger than anything we
> want people to download as a test package.

Yeah, it seems a bit over the top ...

The FCC database sounded like an interesting alternative to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message codeWarrior 2003-04-04 05:27:51 Re: Newbie: problem Connecting to Server
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-04 04:52:39 Re: unable to dump database, toast errors

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro 2003-04-04 10:45:46 Re: [HACKERS] mariposa
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-04-04 04:29:12 Re: [HACKERS] OSS database needed for testing

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert John Shepherd 2003-04-04 10:49:25 Rapid deteriation of performance (might be caused by tsearch?) in 7.3.2
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-04-04 04:29:12 Re: [HACKERS] OSS database needed for testing