Re: [HACKERS] shouldn't pg_dumpall...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] shouldn't pg_dumpall...
Date: 1999-02-26 00:14:51
Message-ID: 29822.919988091@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
> Shouldn't pg_dumpall also dump user privileges?

I believe pg_dumpall -z does it right. That's what I usually use.

I suggested making -z the default a while ago, but no one has gotten
around to doing something about it. (It'd be easy enough, but tedious,
since you'd need to invent a new switch for turning off privilege-
dumping and then update all the documentation. Sigh.)

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerald L. Gay 1999-02-26 00:59:49 Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-02-25 23:30:09 Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot