Re: Proposal: new GUC paramter

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new GUC paramter
Date: 2001-09-26 05:09:37
Message-ID: 29800.1001480977@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> This is really annoying since:
> o these code fragments actually controls the optimization efforts for
> subqueries and views, not related to GEQO at all. So using GEQO
> parameters for this kind of purpose seems abuse for me.

But GEQO_RELS is directly related to the maximum number of FROM-clause
entries that we want to try to handle by exhaustive search. So I think
it's not completely unreasonable to use it for this additional purpose.

Still, if you want to do the work to create another GUC parameter,
I won't object.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-09-26 06:17:36 Re: Unicode combining characters
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-09-26 04:39:38 tuple statistics function