Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, HeikkiLinnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date: 2010-12-25 02:11:12
Message-ID: 297DA80E-01A2-4263-8489-FD7C69F8D29F@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Agreed. Perhaps we need an anti-TODO that lists things we don't want in
> more detail. The TODO has that for a few items, but scaling things up
> there will be cumbersome.

I don't really think that'd be much better. What might be of some value is summaries of previous discussions, *with citations*. Foo seems like it would be useful [1,2,3] but there are concerns about bar [4,5] and baz[6].

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-25 04:36:51 unlogged tables v5
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-12-24 23:46:07 Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump