| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Link to bug webpage |
| Date: | 2001-08-21 15:10:54 |
| Message-ID: | 29777.998406654@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>> That is the real question. Do we want to rely more heavily on a bug
>> database rather than the email lists? I haven't heard many say they
>> want that.
> The database keeps track of it. When someone uses the bugtool to
> report a bug it's mailed to the bugs list.
But the problem is the lack of feedback the other way. In my mind,
and I think in the minds of the rest of the developers, the pgsql-bugs
list is where bug discussions happen. That's not something I have any
interest in trying to change. Thus, I see little point in trying to
maintain a bug database that's separate from the pgsql-bugs archives.
I still think a link to a searchable pgsql-bugs archive could replace
this bug database very easily.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-21 15:11:07 | Re: Link to bug webpage |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2001-08-21 15:10:30 | Current CVS is broken |