Re: 7.2 is slow?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Luis Amigo <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.2 is slow?
Date: 2001-12-19 15:44:41
Message-ID: 29755.1008776681@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Luis Amigo <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es> writes:
> We're getting similar problem.
> We're currently working on TPC-H benchmarking using postgresql 7.2b3.
> From one up to 8 paralell conexions (we've got 8 MIPS processors),

MIPS? Which spinlock implementation is getting used? (Look in
src/include/storage/s_lock.h and src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c)

If you're falling back to the default SysV-semaphore based spinlock
implementation, I wouldn't be surprised to see a performance problem...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-19 15:48:43 Re: FreeBSD/alpha
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-19 15:30:51 Re: 7.2 is slow?