| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PL/Java Development <Pljava-dev(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Shared memory |
| Date: | 2006-03-28 16:38:03 |
| Message-ID: | 2966.1143563883@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pljava-dev |
Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
> This FENCED/NOT FENCED terminology would be a good way to
> differentiate between the two approaches. Any chance of that syntax
> making it into the PostgreSQL grammar, should the need arise?
Of what value would it be to have it in the grammar? The behavior would
be entirely internal to any particular PL in any case.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2006-03-28 16:52:13 | Re: Why are default encoding conversions |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-03-28 16:31:33 | Re: Why are default encoding conversions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-03-28 17:11:00 | Re: Shared memory |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-03-28 15:48:00 | Re: Shared memory |