Re: Vacuum questions...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum questions...
Date: 2005-09-27 23:12:21
Message-ID: 29639.1127862741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> AFAIK, this should allow both to run in seperate transactions.

... and pretty much destroy any synchronization between the two scans,
which was sort of the point wasn't it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-09-27 23:19:11 Re: Open items list for 8.1
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-09-27 22:57:03 Re: Vacuum questions...