Re: UserLock oddity with Limit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)barchord(dot)com>
Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UserLock oddity with Limit
Date: 2001-05-08 15:35:41
Message-ID: 29603.989336141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)barchord(dot)com> writes:
> Fiddling with userlock stuff for the purposes of setting up an action
> queue. Having the lock in the where clause causes the lock code to
> actually lock 2 rows, not just the one that is being returned.

A WHERE clause should *never* contain function calls with side effects.
I do not regard this behavior as a bug. Put the function call in the
SELECT's output list if you want to know exactly which rows it is
evaluated at.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2001-05-08 15:55:44 Re: UserLock oddity with Limit
Previous Message Alexander Klimov 2001-05-08 15:29:38 Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable?