Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date: 2010-08-09 14:39:31
Message-ID: 29409.1281364771@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Right. So, what about Mike's idea of extracting this into a new
> contrib module, perhaps contrib/xslt? That might also provide a good
> excuse to jettison any details of the existing interfaces that we
> happen to find unfortunate.

Seems like mostly make-work to me --- we could just as easily fix the
code where it sits. But if you're excited about it, I won't stand in
the way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-08-09 14:41:36 Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-09 14:22:00 Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?