Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Have you figured out any way to actually track down which para has the
> problem itself, or is it all manual work?
Oh ... the TUG page now has a recipe for finding the problem less
painfully, which I don't recall having seen before:
http://ftp.tug.org/mail-archives/pdftex/2002-February/002216.html
In short, you can add a "draft" option that lets PDF output get generated
anyway, and then you can actually see exactly what link is getting
split.
regards, tom lane