Re: Vacuum full?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum full?
Date: 2002-11-07 21:23:13
Message-ID: 29181.1036704193@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> writes:
> By closing other transactions, did you mean ALL transactions open in
> that database, or just the ones, having anything to do with that table
> (reading/writing)?

I mean ALL.

You can start some new ones right away, but your current open
transactions are determining what VACUUM thinks might be a still-visible
tuple. You need to make the "oldest open transaction number" move
forward.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Miles Elam 2002-11-07 21:23:46 two table foreign keys
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-07 21:22:40 Re: PostgreSQL on Linux and Solaris comparison