| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off |
| Date: | 2016-08-16 13:37:54 |
| Message-ID: | 29142.1471354674@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
>> back further?
> I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
> back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN. I don't
> think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.
I agree with fixing 9.6, but not further back.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-08-16 13:44:18 | Re: [PATCH] bigint txids vs 'xid' type, new txid_recent(bigint) => xid |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2016-08-16 12:58:06 | Re: [PATCH] bigint txids vs 'xid' type, new txid_recent(bigint) => xid |