Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Date:	2010-08-10 14:00:46
Message-ID:	28986.1281448846@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2010-08-10 08:13:22 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>  2010-08-10 11:18:55 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>   2010-08-10 12:01:31 from "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>  2010-08-10 14:00:46 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2010-08-11 04:35:20 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>  2010-08-10 19:45:16 from Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches? at 2010-08-10 08:13:22 from Fujii Masao

Responses

• Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches? at 2010-08-11 04:35:20 from Fujii Masao

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Peter Eisentraut	2010-08-10 14:03:02	Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Previous Message	Greg Sabino Mullane	2010-08-10 13:42:09	Re: [HACKERS] Moderator on Committers?