Re: disbursion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: disbursion
Date: 2000-06-01 23:48:55
Message-ID: 28910.959903335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, since you check pg_statsistic in the optimizer for the most common
> value, should we downgrade the pg_attribute.attdisbursion value when we
> know the value is not the most common value? Are you doing that
> already?

Yeah, we already do. In fact the last tweak in that area was to reduce
the ratio we multiply by in just that situation. It's a poor substitute
for actually having better stats of course...

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • disbursion at 2000-06-01 23:42:39 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-06-01 23:53:09 Re: Problems with recent CVS versions and Solaris.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-01 23:45:07 disbursion again