Re: Functions with COPY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Functions with COPY
Date: 2003-11-28 17:15:35
Message-ID: 28844.1070039735@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> I guess my example was lacking, I'm sure there are cases where the
> text->date casting will end up being wrong or some date style won't be
> accepted. If the above was 'January 10th, 2003, October 1st, 2003,
> January 1st, 2003', for example. Thinking back I think that might have
> been the situation I was thinking about (conflicting mdy and dmy) and
> would have made more sense as an example.

Then what are you after, some magically prescient input mode that will
guess the correct interpretation?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2003-11-28 17:30:08 Re: Functions with COPY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-28 17:13:36 Re: about explain analyze