From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | xeb(at)mail(dot)ru, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] automatic integer conversion |
Date: | 2007-12-08 23:50:02 |
Message-ID: | 28834.1197157802@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Please note that I'm not saying that fixing that issue means the patch
> is acceptable. Personally I'm not sure that this is a worthy goal you
> are pursuing here. Wouldn't it be a good idea to propose the feature
> first and write the code later?
Indeed. For starters, if we are going to try to provide serious
support in libpq for binary-format parameters, it probably ought to
cover more than just integers. OTOH, I think we've already seen
where that line of thought leads, and it looks pretty ugly too:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-12/msg00014.php
Anyway, I'd like to see a design discussion about what any libpq API
changes in this area ought to look like, rather than having it be
determined by who can submit the quickest-and-dirtiest patch.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-12-09 02:27:04 | Re: [PATCH] automatic integer conversion |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-08 23:35:46 | Patch for PQconnectionUsedPassword brain-damage |