| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: GIST question |
| Date: | 2001-05-16 23:05:06 |
| Message-ID: | 28810.990054306@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> we dont' see any problem with removing this field (haskeytype)
>> but it would be **very desirable** first to run regression test
>> (make installcheck) in contrib/intarray after patch applying.
> I did. Regression tests run fine without it.
He asked if you ran the contrib/intarray regress tests, not the
regular ones. (The other GIST contrib modules would also need
to be tested.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-16 23:23:26 | Re: NAMEDATALEN configuration option patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-16 22:11:18 | Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Python Module Patch |