Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Charlie Savage" <cfis(at)savagexi(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED
Date: 2008-10-14 14:44:59
Message-ID: 28738.1223995499@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The user running initdb (or the postmaster) needs
>> SeCreateGlobalPrivilege - which is something we cannot really start
>> telling people they must have. My view is that we revert the change
>> (well, replace it with something that looks less like a broken attempt
>> to use the global namespace) and leave it at that. iirc, the use of
>> the global namespace is there to ensure things work as they should
>> under a non-console terminal services session - which is pretty rare
>> and can usually be avoided.

> I'm not so sure that non-console terminal service sessions should be
> categorized as "pretty rare".

Would there be any value in trying a global name first and falling back
to non-global if that fails?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2008-10-14 14:50:21 Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... CYCLE in vanilla SQL: issues with arrays of rows
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2008-10-14 14:44:04 Re: Version Number Function?