| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Function parameter names |
| Date: | 2003-11-23 19:13:17 |
| Message-ID: | 28726.1069614797@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> And the cost will be fairly large for named parameters as well then. On
> the other hand, if one omits the parameter names one would get almost the
> same speed as before (an extra test is needed to see if we have any
> parameter names that needs to be setup before the language handler is
> called).
I see absolutely no need for the call path to do anything with this
stuff before it reaches the language handler. All the handlers fetch
the pg_proc tuple anyway, and are perfectly capable of extracting the
parameter names for themselves if they want to.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-23 19:17:35 | Re: [7.4] statistics collector: Protocol not supported |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-23 19:09:51 | Re: initdb mkdir_p() doesn't work |