Re: Switching to XML

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Date: 2006-12-10 05:24:57
Message-ID: 28680.1165728297@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

I wrote:
> With the patch it takes me about 5 minutes to do the jade step of the
> PDF build, using this morning's SGML sources. (I don't know how to set
> the TeX configuration to get the pdfjadetex steps to go through, so I
> dunno about total time.)

OK, I read Peter's notes about suitable TeX configuration, and with
that plus suitably patched openjade I get this from a standing start:

$ time make postgres.pdf
... much output ...
Output written on postgres.pdf (1670 pages, 13561269 bytes).
Transcript written on postgres.log.

real 8m23.949s
user 8m14.263s
sys 0m9.241s
$

But my goodness it produces a lot of TeX warnings :-(. I can understand
that no one was gonna look into those with a three-day turnaround time,
but maybe now we can think about cleaning them up? Personally I
haven't used TeX/LaTeX in anger in about ten years, but most of what
scrolled past looked easily fixable, and at least some of it would
translate to visible ugliness in the output.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-10 05:27:25 Re: Switching to XML
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-10 05:13:27 Re: Switching to XML