| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored? |
| Date: | 1999-04-30 13:56:25 |
| Message-ID: | 28667.925480585@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> It seems that postgres does not accept -T option. Checking the source,
> I found that T is not given to getopt() while there is a code to parse
> the -T option. Is there any reason for this?
Looks like a garden-variety oversight from here. While you're fixing
it, I suggest making the order of the getopt() list match the order of
the entries in the big switch statement; the postmaster does it that
way, and that made it a whole lot easier to see that things matched...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-04-30 15:00:03 | Mailing list 'relay' sites ... News servers ... WWW/FTP Mirrors |
| Previous Message | Charles C. Bennett, Jr. | 1999-04-30 12:32:57 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage |