Re: GIT patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIT patch
Date: 2007-08-07 21:03:16
Message-ID: 28559.1186520596@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> How hard will it be to add the infrastructure to allow new index types
> to be added to the server dynamically?

INSERT INTO pg_am VALUES (...);

I don't really think we need more than that, at least not till non-core
index AMs are a whole lot thicker on the ground than they are today.

The real sticking point of course is the desired indexam API changes,
which can hardly be inserted dynamically. Your argument would work
better if there were not API issues to be resolved for both bitmap and
GIT ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2007-08-07 21:30:35 Re: More logging for autovacuum
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-08-07 21:01:50 Re: HOT patch, missing things