Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

From: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date: 2010-02-15 09:33:34
Message-ID: 284655.61561.qm@web29008.mail.ird.yahoo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Yes. There's not going to be any more commitfests for this release, so
> the next commitfest is for 9.1.


Perfect! Where could I find such information? I mean: how could I know
it?

> (don't worry about the lack of enthusiasm for the patch, people are just
> very busy with 9.0 and don't have the energy to think about 9.1 material
> at this point)


I understand! Since it's going to be posted in a CommitFest, I'll try to clean
up the patch a little.

Thank you Greg and Heikki.


Leonardo


      

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: marcin mankDate: 2010-02-15 09:36:40
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after
Previous:From: Takahiro ItagakiDate: 2010-02-15 09:27:12
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add psql tab completion for DO blocks.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group