Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: joe(at)mcknight(dot)de, xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen
Date: 2006-01-17 15:18:23
Message-ID: 28426.1137511103@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The overwhelming amount of development work gets done against HEAD. I would
> start with a once a day run against HEAD, and possibly one against the
> latest stable branch (currently REL8_1_STABLE in cvs). That would get you
> 99% of the possible benefit, I think.

I agree --- I see no reason for us to maintain such documentation for
anything except HEAD. If somebody really wants documentation for a
stable branch, they can build it themselves.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message uwcssa 2006-01-17 16:22:36 function caching problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-17 15:03:35 Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function.

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2006-01-17 17:51:38 Re: [Gforge-admins] PgFoundry Move
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-17 12:42:39 Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen