From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | joe(at)mcknight(dot)de, xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen |
Date: | 2006-01-17 15:18:23 |
Message-ID: | 28426.1137511103@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The overwhelming amount of development work gets done against HEAD. I would
> start with a once a day run against HEAD, and possibly one against the
> latest stable branch (currently REL8_1_STABLE in cvs). That would get you
> 99% of the possible benefit, I think.
I agree --- I see no reason for us to maintain such documentation for
anything except HEAD. If somebody really wants documentation for a
stable branch, they can build it themselves.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | uwcssa | 2006-01-17 16:22:36 | function caching problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-17 15:03:35 | Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-01-17 17:51:38 | Re: [Gforge-admins] PgFoundry Move |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-01-17 12:42:39 | Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen |