Re: Beating Oracle

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl
Cc: bbadger(at)BadgerSE(dot)com, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Beating Oracle
Date: 2002-03-01 15:44:27
Message-ID: 28390.1014997467@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

<jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> writes:
>> In any case, I do not think that libpq or libpqxx can or should try to
>> hide this problem from the client.

> Hiding it completely is impossible, but I'd like to help the client in
> trying to cope with it. And I'm willing to invest some time in trying to
> make that work because IMHO the value to users could be considerable.

Certainly there's value in providing a framework that helps the client
to deal with this. I was just objecting to what might have been a
misreading of your meaning: it seemed you were saying that libpqxx
solves the problem so the client doesn't have to think about it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jtv 2002-03-01 16:28:07 Re: Beating Oracle
Previous Message jtv 2002-03-01 15:36:45 Re: Beating Oracle