Re: plpgsql compile failure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql compile failure
Date: 2003-03-25 14:30:34
Message-ID: 28338.1048602634@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I am seeing the following plpgsql compile failure in CVS:

> I'm seeing the same thing, and I also have bison 1.75.

Considering how trivial the grammar change is, it's hard to call this
anything except a bison bug. I'd be interested to know what causes it
though --- is it worth trying to invent a workaround so people don't
have to upgrade?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-25 15:03:57 Bison 1.85 now required
Previous Message snpe 2003-03-25 14:15:22 Re: updateable cursors & visibility