From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Poul Møller Hansen <freebsd(at)pbnet(dot)dk> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Segmentation Fault |
Date: | 2006-08-16 20:21:19 |
Message-ID: | 28314.1155759679@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Poul_M=F8ller_Hansen?= <freebsd(at)pbnet(dot)dk> writes:
>> Given that you're using duration logging and JDBC, I wonder whether you
>> didn't trip over this recently-identified bug:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg00815.php
>> Patch is here:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-08/msg00278.php
> Sorry but didn't, but I noticed this:
> Also I must notice that the segfault only occur if
> log_min_duration_statement is set to 0
I don't believe that statement actually ... it might have chanced to act
that way in one or two trials for Sergey, but since the bug essentially
consists in access to already-freed-and-perhaps-reused memory, it's not
very predictable whether it will fail visibly or not. In any case the
problem could occur for any duration-logging attempt.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matteo Bertini | 2006-08-16 20:26:10 | Re: hint unique result from union |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-08-16 20:15:39 | Re: plpgsql dynamic queries and optional arguments |