Re: why vacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dave(dot)bath(at)unix(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why vacuum
Date: 2005-10-26 07:00:24
Message-ID: 2827.1130310024@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

"Bath, David" <dave(dot)bath(at)unix(dot)net> writes:
> ... Note that Sybase/MS-SQL's
> check constraint model asserts the constraint BEFORE the trigger, which
> discourages you from attempting to check and handle meaning of data!

Er, doesn't PG do it that way too?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Gonsalves 2005-10-26 07:49:36 Re: why vacuum
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-10-26 06:55:42 Re: pl/* overhead ...