Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items )

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway)
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items )
Date: 2002-07-31 15:05:45
Message-ID: 28268.1028127945@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) writes:
> Mentioning that on -hackers would have been nice -- I've spent a while
> this week hacking autoconf / Makefiles to integrate libpqxx...

Marc's opinion is not the same thing as a done deal ;-) --- we still
have to discuss this, and if someone's already doing the integration
work I think that's an important factor.

> If we're going to start removing interfaces, I'd vote for the removal of
> perl5 & libpq++ as well as libpqxx.

Agreed on that point. We shouldn't be promoting old, crufty interface
libraries when there are better ones available.

I would personally prefer to see libpqxx integrated now, and then we
could plan to remove libpq++ in a release or two (after giving people
a reasonable opportunity to switch over). If anyone still cares about
libpq++ at that point, it could be given a home on gborg.

One reason for wanting to integrate libpqxx is that I don't think we'll
find out anything about its portability until we get a lot of people
trying to build it. If it's a separate distro that won't happen quickly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-31 15:09:58 Re: WAL file location
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-07-31 14:55:00 Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items )