Re: non-integer constant in ORDER BY: why exactly, and documentation?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: non-integer constant in ORDER BY: why exactly, and documentation?
Date: 2012-10-11 21:06:23
Message-ID: 28246.1349989583@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hi. I recently ran a query that generate the same error as this:
> SELECT * FROM generate_series(1,10) ORDER BY 'foo';
> ERROR: non-integer constant in ORDER BY

> I am curious though about why this "limitation" exists. I get that integer
> constants are reserved for sorting by column numbers. But if Postgres
> already knows that it's a non-integer constant, why not let it go through
> with the (admittedly pointless) ordering?

I think the argument was that it's almost certainly a mistake, so we're
more helpful by throwing an error than by silently executing a query
that probably won't do what the user was expecting. In this particular
example, it seems quite likely that the programmer meant "foo" (ie a
quoted column reference) and got the quote style wrong ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A.M. 2012-10-11 21:07:28 Re: non-integer constant in ORDER BY: why exactly, and documentation?
Previous Message John R Pierce 2012-10-11 21:06:14 Re: moving from MySQL to pgsql