Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?
Date: 2003-05-05 16:09:29
Message-ID: 28222.1052150969@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> ...which seems weird to me. Is this something that needs fixing in 7.3.3?

It would be a really bad idea to make such a significant change in
trigger behavior in a dot-release ... think of it as a 7.4 proposal,
instead. (Or maybe 7.5, considering how close the 7.4 feature freeze
date is.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2003-05-05 16:13:57 Re: Transform groups (more FE/BE protocol issues)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-05 16:07:48 Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?