| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Eric Cyr <eric(dot)cyr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SIGTTIN / SIGTTOU handling (was Re: BUG #15449) |
| Date: | 2018-11-17 19:11:24 |
| Message-ID: | 28166.1542481884@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2018-Nov-17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the lack of complaints, there's probably no need for back-patch,
>> but that's what I'd propose in HEAD to make this saner.
> Hmm, but the bug was reported on pg10 ... why wouldn't we backpatch this
> fix there?
The complaint was about SIGPIPE handling (or lack of it). I do intend
to back-patch the fix for that. This is just a side issue that came
up in that thread.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-17 20:22:20 | Re: BUG #15160: planner overestimates number of rows in join when there are more than 200 rows coming from CTE |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-11-17 18:35:00 | Re: SIGTTIN / SIGTTOU handling (was Re: BUG #15449) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2018-11-17 19:30:07 | Now/current_date and proleakproof |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-11-17 18:35:00 | Re: SIGTTIN / SIGTTOU handling (was Re: BUG #15449) |