| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
| Date: | 2014-02-04 01:10:22 |
| Message-ID: | 27965.1391476222@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Please find attached a patch implementing lsn as a datatype, based on
> the one Robert wrote a couple of years ago.
> Patch contains regression tests as well as a bit of documentation.
> Perhaps this is too late for 9.4, so if there are no objections I'll
> simply add this patch to the next commit fest in June for 9.5.
I may have lost count, but aren't a bunch of the affected functions new
in 9.4? If so, there's a good argument to be made that we should get
this in now, rather than waiting and having an API change for those
functions in 9.5.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-02-04 01:23:14 | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-04 01:09:01 | Re: pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards. |