Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date: 2009-07-24 15:38:06
Message-ID: 27962.1248449886@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
> I've attached a slightly edited patch which fixes a compiler warning in
> encode.c, too.

Bernd, are you done reviewing this or did you intend to do more?
It's still marked as "needs review" on the commitfest page.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-07-24 16:40:22 Re: When is a record NULL?
Previous Message mahendra chavan 2009-07-24 15:25:40 Re: query decorrelation in postgres