Re: more on initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more on initdb
Date: 2003-10-06 16:19:32
Message-ID: 27952.1065457172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> initdb is kinda hokey, again probably for historic reasons, and that if
> it were being redesigned from scratch today a better way would be to
> have an cluster image built at compile time and just copied and tweaked
> at runtime. Almost all the required info appears to be known at compile
> time, AFAICS.

One thing we would rather not have to freeze at compile time is the
locale settings...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-06 16:27:06 Re: more on initdb
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-06 16:12:45 Re: more on initdb