| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Datetime patch |
| Date: | 2003-07-25 19:51:40 |
| Message-ID: | 27877.1059162700@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have never seen YY/MM/DD, only YYYY-MM-DD.
You have apparently forgotten what was standard practice just a few
years ago.
> The huge problem is
> deciding out how to decode 03-02-01. I think we have to require the
> century for those.
No, the entire point is to drive it off datestyle, *not* off the input
value ranges.
> If that is the only issue, I can ask on general, but I doubt someone is
> going to pipe up.
I really dislike the idea that we are going to legislate this behavior
in a three-person discussion on -patches. The people who will be
screaming about it don't read -patches.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-25 20:12:24 | Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-25 19:46:08 | Re: Datetime patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-25 20:12:24 | Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-25 19:46:08 | Re: Datetime patch |